Which of the following best describes the Cherokee's main argument in the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia case? A) the cherokee testified that u.s. officials had unfairly tricked them into giving up their lands. B) the cherokee argued that because they had lived in the territory first, they could not be removed. C) the cherokee claimed that because they were an independent nation, they could not be governed by state laws. D) the cherokee explained that because they had no central government, they should remain in familiar territory

The answer would be C. The Cherokee claimed that because they were an independent nation and the state recognized them as such in peace treaties, they could not be governed by state law.

Hope this helped you!

Answer Link

gauravsingh23VT gauravsingh23VT · Answer 2 · 2022-05-30T14:40:23+02:00

The cherokee claimed that because they were an independent nation, they could not be governed by state laws is best describes the Cherokee's main argument in the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia case.

What happened in the Cherokee Nation v Georgia case?

In Georgia, the Cherokee Nation was declared sovereign by the US Supreme Court. The court has enforced the law to take the people out from the land.

Georgia has no legal capacity to implement its laws within its boundaries, according to Chief Justice John Marshall's judgement.

Thus, option C is correct.

For more information about Cherokee Nation v Georgia case, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/22750307

#SPJ2