Respuesta :
There are no IDs in the data, and the researcher won't communicate or meddle with the subjects. These factors were in line with the IRB's conclusion that this activity did not qualify as research involving human participants. Here option B is the correct answer.
A human subject is defined under federal rules as a living person about whom a researcher doing a study obtains: Information obtained through intervention or conversation with the person.
Projects that meet the criteria for research must undergo IRB evaluation and approval. Use human beings as well. Include any contact or intervention involving the use of identifiable private information involving human people.
In general, the requirements demand that the investigator get individuals' informed permission. A subject's lawfully appointed representative can also provide investigators with informed consent.
Complete question:
Which of the following considerations was relevant to the IRB's determination that this activity does not constitute research with human subjects?
A - A researcher wants to conduct a secondary analysis using a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) database that was collected by the agency solely for surveillance purposes from 1996-2006.
B - The researcher did not participate in the initial collection of the data.
C - The database is publicly available. The database does not include any identifiers.
D - The IRB makes a determination that the individuals whose records will be reviewed do not meet the federal definition of human subjects.
To learn more about IRB
https://brainly.com/question/14353183
#SPJ4