Is Stevens correct in holding that our privacy interests in our residence, after the issuance of a no-knock warrant, consistent with the privacy interests we retain after the police are in the residence, in the context of a protective sweep? Same question, only consistent with the privacy interests we retain in our personal autonomy in the frisk aspect of a Terry stop? Is there a difference based on the status of the police intrusion? In other words, in the no-knock context, the citizen's interests are defined in the context of immediately prior to, or during the entry into the premises (i.e. the execution of the warrant), while in the protective sweep and the Terry frisk the defendant's privacy interests are already intruded upon.

People are shielded from government unreasonable searches and seizures by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. However, only those searches and seizures that are deemed unreasonable by law are protected by the Fourth Amendment.

In public, do you have the right to privacy?

Expectation of Privacy in Public Although a person may not have the right to privacy when in public, the law can still protect them from having their private information broadcast or from being portrayed in a way that could be considered humiliating.

Learn more about Fourth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/28246295

#SPJ4