Respuesta :
Secondary sources are important because they provide perspectives into the primary sources, and helps to provide context and different points of views from how we interpret the information we receive from primary sources. Therefore providing us with more insights from others as we weight our own perspectives.
Secondary sources are often referred to as the learned perspective, providing their own insights much like our own when we formulate an answer out of an event; drawing out conclusions based on facts and proof of the facts at hand.
They usually come in the form of commentaries; comparing primary sources with other primary sources, or with documents, scholarly journals/documents, published articles, peer-reviewed reports/journals and so on.
It helps us refine our original perspectives, augment them if necessary, to be as historically accurate as possible.
For example, when we read The Social Contract by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, unless we are extremely learned with the entire history of the Enlightenment and the ideals and perspectives of the era; it would be quite difficult to exactly interpret the actual meaning as meant by the author.
Harder still, is trying to fully comprehend The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli. To fully understand it, one must be wholly consummate with the historical and political perspectives of the middle ages. In the world today his work can be completely misinterpreted, especially since the book itself is about how to be an effective ruler or authority for princes and royals.
Thus in order to fully understand what an author wishes to convey, we look to other sources, such as encyclopedias, short summaries, scholarly journals, lectures, or even documentaries. These secondary sources are vital for exactly this purpose.
On another hand when we are looking at historical artifacts, secondary sources often helps us to correctly identify what we may recover; since these sources often comes with pictures or other visual tools to help us identify what it is we may have found.
Most importantly in terms of audio-visual media such as historical films and period dramas, documentaries, interviews and so forth are always classified as secondary sources.
They are important because they offer entertainment inspired by historical events, though often distorted for a multitude of purposes; but they can lead to more people wanting to know the actual events, how things really went, and what really happened in real life.
Be it from primary sources such as Reminiscences, an autobiography of General Douglas MacArthur, or The Complete Works of Julius Caesar written by himself; or through other secondary sources such as biographies, books, published journals by other writers, memoirs and so on, secondary sources provides both external perspectives and insights to help explain and formulate our own conclusions.
#SPJ1
Secondary sources are used to interpret or clarify the meaning of the data in primary sources.
What are secondary sources ?
Secondary sources include essays, novels, and other written works that analyze, interpret, or summarize the facts surrounding a historical event.
A secondary source might be a book authored by a historian, for instance. Since the historian wasn't there when it happened, they reconstruct the events' timeline using diaries and other primary sources.
Scholarly or popular books and journal articles, histories, criticisms, reviews, commentaries, encyclopedias, and textbooks are a few examples of secondary sources. Secondary sources analyze, evaluate, summarize, and process primary sources by describing, debating, interpreting, and commenting on them.
To know more about secondary sources you may visit the link :
https://brainly.com/question/336747
#SPJ4
