NO LINKS!
Please help me
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e4f2/1e4f283adc384b65d6441658e9a7df67ed03b195" alt="NO LINKSPlease help me class="
Reason:
If we were asked to compute log(ab), then we could use this log rule
log(ab) = log(a) + log(b)
However, we aren't multiplying the 'a' and b, so we cannot use the log rule above. There's not enough information to be able to compute log(a+b)
Choice C is a trick answer I've seen many students fall for since the erroneous thinking would be log(a+b) = log(a)+log(b) = 1.2+5.6 = 6.8
Answer:
b) Not enough information
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the logs of two values, you want to know the log of their sum.
The logarithm function cannot be applied to a sum. The purpose of the logarithm function is to turn the log of a product into a sum of logs. The logarithm function cannot be applied to a sum.
The only way to determine the log of the sum is to take the antilogs of the given values, add them, then take the log of the result.
Assuming the base of the logarithms is 10, using the strategy just described, we can compute ...
log(a +b) = log(10^log(a) +10^log(b)) = log(10^1.2 +10^5.6)
≈ log(15.848932 +398,107.17) ≈ log(398,123.02)
≈ 5.6000173 . . . . using base 10 logs
If these are natural logs, which are also often written as log(x), as well as ln(x), then the log of the sum is about
log(e^1.2 +e^5.6) ≈ 5.6122026 . . . . using base e logs
The short answer is, there is not enough information. (The base of the logarithms must be known.)