[ Considering there is a mistake, as, the question starts as,
Sample response: This response does not corroborate Washington's, because it indicates that there were far more enemy troops present than Washington indicates. Washington's summary is critical of the cowardice of his troops, while this source undermines some of Washington's criticisms ? ]
No, the source could not be used to support Washington’s account.
This is because of the reason that, the source is putting even the whole of the account in doubt. The source had much overestimated the number of enemy troops.
Washington had shown that the number of troops with him were not very much and the source which was presented had over estimated and presented a bigger number of troops.
Thus, it can be claimed that, that source can't be said as an ideal source to claiming his words.
To know more about, Washington, click here-
https://brainly.com/question/14598321
#SPJ4
