We can say that the calculated correlation coefficient to be 0, cannot allow Randolph to conclude that there is no relationship between bacteria growth and time as if the correlation coefficient is 0, there is not a linear relationship, but there could be another type of relationship, making option A the right choice.
A correlation coefficient provides a numerical definition of correlation. This variable accepts values in the range of -1 to 1. Perfect negative linear correlation, or a straight line flowing downhill, has a coefficient of -1. On the other hand, a +1 coefficient indicates a complete positive linear association. No linear correlation exists when the correlation is zero.
Only linear associations can be found using the correlation coefficient. It doesn't always follow that there isn't a relationship there just because the correlation coefficient is close to 0.
Thus, we can say that the calculated correlation coefficient to be 0, cannot allow Randolph to conclude that there is no relationship between bacteria growth and time as if the correlation coefficient is 0, there is not a linear relationship, but there could be another type of relationship, making option A the right choice.
Learn more about the correlation coefficient at
https://brainly.com/question/11850486
#SPJ4
The provided question is incomplete. The complete question is:
"Randolph calculated the correlation coefficient to be 0 when counting bacteria growth over a period of 14 days. He concluded that there is no relationship between bacteria growth and time.
Is Randolph correct? Explain your reasoning.
A) Randolph's conclusion is not correct. If the correlation coefficient is 0, there is not a linear relationship, but there could be another type of relationship.
B) Randolph's conclusion is correct. If the correlation coefficient is 0, there is a linear relationship.
C) Randolph's conclusion is not correct. If the correlation coefficient is less than 1, there is not a linear relationship, but there could be another type of relationship.
D) Randolph's conclusion is correct. If the correlation coefficient is greater than −1, there is not a linear relationship, but there could be another type of relationship.
E) Randolph's conclusion is correct. If the correlation coefficient is less than 1, there is not a linear relationship, but there could be another type of relationship."
