The 1961 mapp v. ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney. the right to remain silent after an arrest. the use of incriminating statements. the use of illegally obtained evidence.

Question

11-05-2022
History

contestada

The 1961 mapp v. ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney. the right to remain silent after an arrest. the use of incriminating statements. the use of illegally obtained evidence.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

On November 1, 2018, Quantum Technology, a geothermal energy supplier, borrowed $22 million cash to fund a geological survey. The loan was made by Nevada BancCo

The case of Max v. National Credit Co. is heard in a trial court. The case of O! Boy! Ice Cream Co. v. Refrigerated Transport, Inc. is heard in an appellate co

What governmental system did Thomas Paine's pamphlet, Common Sense, claim was corrupt? A. Bureaucracy B. Parliament C. The court system

In what city and in what year was the constitution written

A student measures the mass of a beaker filled with corn oil. The mass reading averages 200.6 g and the mass of the beaker is 10.69 g. What is the mass of the c

Explain how energy moves through a food chain and a food web.

For the lines defined by the following equations indicate with a "V" if they are vertical, an "H" if they are horizontal, and an "S" (for slanted) if they are n

The following selected transactions relate to liabilities of Chicago Glass Corporation for 2016. Chicago's fiscal year ends on December 31. 1. On January 15,

Thumb Ink Inc. is a publishing company based in the United States. Its marketing and supply chain activities will add value when: a. it dispatches new quality

Martebi Martebi · Answer 1 · 2022-05-16T11:30:07+02:00

The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence.

What is illegally obtained evidence?

The term illegally Obtained Evidence is known to be the type of evidence that can be made or gotten that is against the normal way of obtaining evidence.

Note that The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence and this can influence the judgement made.

Learn more about evidence from

https://brainly.com/question/1256677

#SPJ4

pamsuecar82 pamsuecar82 · Answer 2 · 2022-06-06T17:37:12+02:00

pamsuecar82 pamsuecar82

06-06-2022

Answer:

D- the use of illegally obtained evidence.

Explanation:

Many people have put this explanation. I got it right on 2022 Edge.

Answer Link