The League of Nations envisioned a concept of collective security where if any country attacked another, all of the other countries in the League would unify and come to the aid of the country under attack. There are many weaknesses in the conception of collective security.
What are the weaknesses of collective security?
- League of Nations envisioned it working under a concept called collective security, under which if any country attacked another, all of the other countries in the League would unify and come to the aid of the country under attack.
- Most American opponents of the League of Nations argued that, by joining it, the United States would give up a degree of independence.
- Another weakness of collective security is its failure to establish a permanent peace-keeping agency.
- It entirely relied upon the decision-making authority of powerful nation-states, already provided with enormous influence.
- It could not have really prevented war under any circumstance.
- Collective security significantly did away with the idea of neutrality in times of war or military aggression.
- Collective security, as a concept, could not apply to many nation-states and colonies and was, therefore, a restricted concept.
Hence, the League of Nations' envisioning of collective security was ripe with many weaknesses, namely its lack of establishment of a permanent peace-keeping body, among others.
Learn more about the League of Nations' collective security here: https://brainly.com/question/21140140
#SPJ2
