Comparing and contrasting characters or even texts is not usually a good way to discuss the meaning or value of a work.

a. true
b. false

Respuesta :

Comparing and contrasdting characters or even texts is not usually good way to discuss the meaning or value of a worm.


Answer B. False
vaduz

The given statement "comparing and contrasting characters or even texts is not usually a good way to discuss the meaning or value of a work" is false.

Comparing and contrasting a text is one of the ways to analyze and comprehend a text. This method helps in the better understanding of the text as a whole.

  • To understand and comprehend a story or text, or even a character, it is best to analyze the text or character.
  • This means to break down the character or text, delving into the smaller details.
  • One way of doing that is the compare-contrast method where the text or character(s) comparison is done.
  • Comparison is made through the elements of similarity between them.
  • Also, contrast is when the differences are taken into consideration.

For analysis and a better understanding of a text or character, the compare and contrast method is one of the ways. Thus, the given statement that compare and contrast is not usually a good way to discuss the meaning or value of a work is false.

Learn more about "compare-contrast" here:

brainly.com/question/14505346

Ver imagen vaduz