contestada

Assuming that Caleb is correct about the amount of contact that Wizard Internet has had with people in Montana, is it likely that the courts in Montana would have jurisdiction over Wizard?
a. Probably, since anyone in Montana can pull up the website.
b. Probably since Montana is in the United States.
c. Probably not, since the company has not reached out to anyone in Montana.
d. Probably not since the company is not located in Montana.

Respuesta :

Heroine26

Answer: option (C). Probably not, since the company has not reached out to anyone in Montana.

Explanation:- in the example given, Assuming that Caleb is correct about the amount of contact that Wizard Internet has had with people in Montana, is it likely that the courts in Montana would have jurisdiction over Wizard? The answer is Probably not, since the company has not reached out to anyone in Montana. Simply having a website with passive advertising that can be acccessed in Montana is not enough reason for a courts in Montana to have jurisdiction over wizard.

Otras preguntas