Li believes that the graph shows a direct variation. Why is Li incorrect in saying that the graph shows a direct variation?

1) The graph does not have a constant rate of change.
2) When the x-value is 0, the y-value is 1.
3) The slope is negative.
4) The relationship is proportional.

Li believes that the graph shows a direct variation Why is Li incorrect in saying that the graph shows a direct variation 1 The graph does not have a constant r class=

Respuesta :

Answer:

Option 2) When the x-value is 0, the y-value is 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form [tex]y/x=k[/tex] or [tex]y=kx[/tex]

In a proportional relationship the constant of proportionality k is equal to the slope m of the line and the line passes through the origin

Remember that in a direct variation

For x=0, the value of y is equal to zero too

therefore

The graph is not a direct variation , because

When the x-value is 0, the y-value is 1.

Answer:

b. or 2. When the x-value is 0, the y-value is 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

I just took the quiz ;)