Maryland argued that McCulloch, a cashier at the bank, needed to pay his taxes. The final result was that Maryland didn't have the authority to tax the bank.
so yes they did argue.
Answer:
Hello! In McCulloch vs Maryland, the State of Maryland argued that McCulloch, a cashier at the bank, needed to pay his taxes. The final result was that Maryland didn't have the authority to tax the bank. Hope this helps! ^-^
Step-by-step explanation:
