Througout the year, supreme court justices review cases that have been appealed to the court. when a seccion begins, the justices select a handful of cases to more fully review and decide. the justices debate the fact of the selected cases and then vote on a preliminary ruling. for each case, one justices writes a majority opinion, summarizing the court's reasoning. justices who disagree with the ruling may writer their own dissenting opinions to explain their objections. lawers for ech party in the case are allwed to make public arguements in an attempt to sway the justices and adress their questions. after the lawers make their public remarks, the justices take a final vote on a verdict. the court rules according to a majorty of the justices votes. which saement best summarizes the innacuracy contained in this description of the supreme court's decision making process?