Consider how the reading of the book would have been different if, from the beginning, you had known all the background information from chapters 11-13, Into The Wild. How would your reading experience have been different if Krakauer had begun the story discussing McCandless as a child, his parent's relationship, and followed his life chronologically (instead of beginning the book with McCandless's death)? Why do you think Krakauer chose to do it this way? (4-6 sentences)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48ac1/48ac1bfdbbabdc155b941c171d7a8f2675d8a77f" alt="Consider how the reading of the book would have been different if from the beginning you had known all the background information from chapters 1113 Into The Wi class="